Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 03:10

Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
An Extreme Drop in Oxygen Will Eventually Suffocate Most Life on Earth - ScienceAlert
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Devin Harjes, "Boardwalk Empire" and "Manifest" actor, dies at 41 - CBS News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Hauler Talk: Dissecting the wet-weather tire rules for Mexico City - NASCAR.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial day 27 recap: Judge signals plans to remove a juror - ABC News
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Tomatoes Recalled Over 'High Risk of Illness or Death' - Newser
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
SpaceX May Be Failing to Get Starship Working at All - futurism.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Scientists just learned the age of America's deepest canyon - SFGATE
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Taylor Swift Wears a Bejeweled LBD for a Celebratory Girls Night Out with Selena Gomez - instyle.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sea cucumbers may help slow the spread of cancer, and without the side effects - Earth.com